The Big Idea
As I continue to learn and experiment with memory methods here are core principles that have started to surface for me.
Related Notes:
Personal Learning Method
Memorizing the Psalms
Memorizing the Lords Prayer
Memorizing the Ten Commandments
Memory, the Things We Keep with Us
Jack and the Magic Cellar
Reference:
1—Index- Memory and Remembering - Loose Resources
I began this project rather by accident. I have always been someone who has disliked memorization. In school it was boring and repetitive. Not to mention can become overwhelming and disappointing. There is nothing worse than working really hard to remember something just for it to fly away right when you really need it.
And so it was with a great amount of bewildered curiosity that I heard the Storyteller Martin Shaw describe memorizing the entire Odyssey of Homer and that it takes multiple days to retell it in its entirety. That kind of scale just boggled my imagination.
I was raised on the computer metaphor of memory. Learning is like “downloading” information that you store on the “hard drive” of your mind. The memories in your mind are therefore a kind of collection of random bits and pieces you hope you can find enough space for. Surely somewhere along the road you will run out of space just like that old broken down laptop shoved in the closet. But even if you have “good memory” and won’t run out of space, then surely something as massive as a whole book will get fuzzy and forgotten quickly?
I have realized that our modern minds are becoming increasingly claustrophobic. We think less and less of our internal world in favor of more and more external technology. How have we come to live in a world that sees the Second Council of Nicaea’s (787 AD) requirement for bishops as near impossible:
“Candidates for a bishop’s orders must know the Psalter by heart and must have read thoroughly, not cursorily, all the sacred Scriptures.”
What follows is partially a journal, partially an invitation, to begin to rethink the way we treat our memory in teaching and study. In a world ever more flooded with distractions and noise, our understanding and practice of memory seems to have atrophied in favor of heaping resources and praise on the machines we increasingly rely on.
We have also internalized the mechanistic metaphors with which our machines are organized. In doing so we have increasingly started to understand ourselves in terms of computers and the paradigms that define digital data storage. This tends to encourage a one to one comparison of what we can “store” in a hard drive on a computer versus what we can “store” within our memory. This instantly puts us in a place of discouragement as we wade through the sea of information around us. But memory has been with humans far longer than computers.
Proverbs 6:21 and Deuteronomy 6:8-9 both picture memory as a kind of strapping on and binding together. In many ways this is a freeing conception of memory in that it removes the perennial concern of “running out of space” and replaces it with a more accurate account of the living act of memory and recall.
The actually philosophy and theory behind ideas of memory is far reaching and varied across many difference eras from the image heavy techniques of Hugh of St. Victor and Thomas Aquinas to the logic heavy method of Petra Ramus. Yet St. Augustine’s observations of his own memory are a humbling reminder of how little we truly understand of ourselves: “the force of mine own memory is not understood by me; though I cannot so much as name myself without it.” - Confessions Book X, St. Augustine
Therefore with a get amount of mystery and ambiguity I have taken a dive into memory techniques, I have started to realize a few consistently emerging principles that help make sense of things on a practical level.
To start there seems to be two major forms of memory: Conscious and Subconscious.
Conscious memory is all the stuff you intentionally work with and recall.
Subconscious memory are all the things that have soaked into you over time.
This distinction is also sometimes called “artificial” vs “natural” memory.
Memory techniques and drills most often work on conscious memory.
There are however strategies like comprehensible input, muscle memory drills, etc. that seek to fill memory on a subconscious level.
The following principles are primarily aimed at conscious memory. However, I believe that much of it does transfer over to subconscious memory even if only implicitly.
Concepts to Think about How they Relate
Proximal affect
And levels of processing
Memory is all about Associations
- Memory is all about associations. It is the core mechanic that makes things stick in your mind.
- Example: Think of a cow or any animal you know well. You know its sound, name, associated colors, and can (at least roughly) picture it. From there you maybe even have a particular texture, smells, locations, and even stories all associated together flowing from one to the next. That constellation of things (which was given to you piece by piece by parents and teachers even before you remember) make the animal itself easy to remember and call to mind. Now compare a well known animal to one you do not know well or have only seen a few times. The lower density of associations should be easy to perceive.
- Therefore, Memory’s basic unit is association not space as we normally think of it. It is easier to remember many unique things that connect with others we are familiar with than many similar ones.
- Example: It can be hard to remember where you parked because you have done the same thing in the same car even at the same location many times.
- All memory systems and techniques are really just ways to find and form associations in a consistent and easily recallable manner.
- Some major types of associations are:
- Aristotle categorized the main types of associations as similarity, contrast and contiguity. Not sure I am locked into that but worth keeping in mind.
- Things that are similar to on another.
- Things that are opposites or contrast.
- Things that flow or belong together.
- E.S.C.A.P.E being boring. From Unlock Your Amazing Memory by Brad Zupp
- Exaggeration - Make things larger than life or unique proportions.
- Silliness - Make things funny and amusing.
- Color - Make things unique colors.
- Action - Add vivid movement and motion.
- People - People are easier to remember and have a lot of built in associations from ways you have related to them. Especially in the case of family, friends, teachers, celebrities, etc.
- Example Grandma reminds you of treats on Christmas, etc.
- Emotion - Feelings that are compelling.
- KAVE COGS from Anthony Metivier A. Magnetic Memory Method Mini Class
- Kinesthetic - Sense of Touch
- Actions
- Texture, weight, etc., tactile and embodied associations
- Auditory - Sense of Hearing
- Starts with the same letter
- Rhymes
- Sounds similar
- Melodic (singing) association
- Visual - Sense of Sight
- Looks similar, etc.
- Color, material, shadows, light, shape, etc.
- Emotional - Feelings and gut reactions.
- Conceptual - The abstract concept or framework of a thing
- Reminds you of something similar
- Example: the word “For” reminds me of someone golfing and yelling “FOUR”
- Belongs together - concepts, ideas, scenes, environments (i.e. farm), etc.
- Example: Cow makes you think of moo makes you think of milk, etc.
- Logically belongs together or leads to each other
- Example: Animals at a zoo to elephant, etc.
- Reminds you of something similar
- Olfactory - Sense of Smell
- Gustatory - Sense of Taste and mouth feel.
- Spatial - placement in space.
- Kinesthetic - Sense of Touch
- Aristotle categorized the main types of associations as similarity, contrast and contiguity. Not sure I am locked into that but worth keeping in mind.
- Some major types of associations are:
- Memory and Associations do not run on “space” as much as on “hooks”.
- For example: connecting a new name to a similar sound, object, and action. May seem like it would take more “space” but in reality it has more “hooks” that hold the new name in your mind. Without strong associative hooks new things will float away no matter how much “space” you are “saving” in your memory.
- The more you associate and anchor in your mind. The more you can continue to pull in new information and associate it. This process of using what you know to learn more is commonly called “laddering.”
- In other words, there is a bit of an exponential effect. The more you have anchored, the more options you have for forming associations to anchor new things and the more firmly rooted old things become.
- New Associations are only formed working from known to unknown.
- Associations only “hook” in new information when they connect to something already in your mind. If you try to remember a bunch of new things and associate them all together you will get overwhelmed and nothing is really connected into your mind as it is now.
- Use what is already in your mind to help pull in new things you want to remember. Any and everything already there can be leveraged to help make associations with the new thing you want to learn. The more associations the better. This could be songs, places, concepts, people, animals, sounds, experiences, literally everything already in your mind can be used in one way or another to form associations with something new.
- Memory is more like painting than computer processing.
- Memory needs to work in layers and chunks. Just like an artist painting with one color at a time or creating one texture at a time. Memory can be build by focusing on particular aspects one after another. Layering then can create a robust memory and understanding of a thing. Rather than a one dimensional rote memorization of something.
- Example: The lords prayer is often memorized by rote initially. This is great because it means it is “on board” someone’s memory. But this is just one layer of memorization. A notable weakness of pure rote memorization surfaces with larger things to memorize, because it is very likely you may never clear the initial onboarding of the martial before giving up. Further, when I had only a rote layer of the Lord’s Prayer, I could not tell you the divisions of the petitions, or the main verbs in each petition, or how the flow of the prayer changes from the first three petitions to the last four. But over time, I have worked to layer on additional associations to help make the prayer more than one singular block of text that is rattled off. Instead, it has increasingly become the big beautiful prayer it is that connects to all kinds of things across Scripture and daily life. This process of layering on new associations is never truly finished.
- Memory needs to work in layers and chunks. Just like an artist painting with one color at a time or creating one texture at a time. Memory can be build by focusing on particular aspects one after another. Layering then can create a robust memory and understanding of a thing. Rather than a one dimensional rote memorization of something.
- Lower mental load makes any strategy more effective and easier to use.
- If you have to spend all your attention trying to figure out a method or mnemonic it will not actually be helpful. The only way to fix that is find a less mentally taxing method or focus on memorizing the method itself before using it. The best methods help to lower how hard it is to work with things you are trying to memorize.
- The key principle as always is leverage what is already in your mind, don’t go looking for some “secret key.” Even if that “key” may be helpful eventually, you still need to pull it into memory with what you have first.
- Every memory, or set of things memorized, has an entry point(s)
- Every memory, or set of things memorized, has certain paths of travel. The minimum is one (start to finish) but there are ways to think about different paths of travel through memories: front to back, back to front, leap frog (or odds and evens), random access, slicing across similar line numbers, slicing across similar themes or images (sometimes called “chaining), items by 10s, etc.
- Memory Palaces are one of the most effective ways to create a mental “super structure” that can be navigated in all of these various ways. Other forms of organization (Such as peg systems, or the story method) can achieve similar navigation but in my experience is not nearly as robust or “sticky.”
- Be intentional about where you work to place entry points so you can access what you need to recall easily and well. If you have to recite or go through a bunch of stuff to get to the phrase or part of what you want - you need more entry points.
- You may be surprised how much easier it is to recall things after practicing an alternative navigation path.
- Every memory, or set of things memorized, has certain paths of travel. The minimum is one (start to finish) but there are ways to think about different paths of travel through memories: front to back, back to front, leap frog (or odds and evens), random access, slicing across similar line numbers, slicing across similar themes or images (sometimes called “chaining), items by 10s, etc.
- Increased associations increases the access points to a thing in memory.
- Rote memorization starts with one access point and just runs through. If you can’t find that one point you often can’t find anything else that comes after it.
- More robust associations allow for searching when a particular point refuses to come to mind. You can start with what you do remember that is related and walk yourself into what you are looking for. The process of searching like this itself greatly strengthens a memory (especially if you do in deed find it with some work) rather than always giving up and looking the thing up.
- There are two primary conscious “operations” you can do while forming an association: connecting and placing.
- Connecting is when you take an old thing in your mind and connect it to the new thing using some form of association.
- Placing is a particular form of connecting where you want to “leave” new information in “containers” of buildings or things already in your mind. It basically gives the new thing a home in your mind rather than letting it float in the “void.” There are various ways to accomplish this:
- Placed Spatially like in a memory palace.
- Placed Logically like in an outline, Ramist tree, Mind map, or flow chart.
- Placed Sequentially like in lines for a play or using the Story or Link methods.
- If there is no intentional structure to memorization projects they will get out of hand quickly.
- You need a peg system or a Memory Palace or something to allow you to traverse the project at a high level in your mind and then access specific things.
- For example, Luther pictured all Scripture as a “Great Tree” with all the words as “little branches.” This paints a clear conceptual picture of how he navigated from the big picture to the small picture.
- Without this kind of ability to zoom in and out you end up having to start at the beginning of a huge book or block of information not being able to access things that are in the middle or near the end well which then makes them easy to forget. See heading Forces That Tend to Work Against Our Memory below.
- You need a peg system or a Memory Palace or something to allow you to traverse the project at a high level in your mind and then access specific things.
- What you are trying to remember should affect the approach you take to forming associations.
- Symbols and Words
- Numbers - Phone numbers or other significant numbers
- Words - Vocabulary, spelling, or foreign language words
- Abstract Constructs
- Concepts - abstract ideas, facts (Trivia night anyone?), etc.
- Frameworks, and Theories, etc.
- Verbatim Text
- Phrases/Sentences/Longer Quotations - Bible verses, quotes, etc.
- Word for word recitation of play lines or story.
- Skeleton Memorization (Remember the skeleton and major points fill in the rest naturally as you recite)
- Stories - Personal, Biblical, or Historical
- Speeches and presentations
- Symbols and Words
- Well structured memory can allow for mental manipulation of information not otherwise possible.
- Working memory only has so much space. You need to be able to pull things in and out of working memory well to be able to work with a large amount of information.
- A good structure allows you to traverse up and down the tree of chucks, or to zoom in and out. This allows for many more individual pieces of information to be handled than possible in an unassisted working memory.
- One example is being able to string together related lines of psalms across many psalms. You are not just locked into one particular psalm at a time, but can start to make a chain of related lines and metaphors. Like 8 and 19 both picturing creation’s praise of God. St. Athanasius’ Letter to Marcellinus has many similar examples of connecting Psalms together based on a variety of commonalities.
Warning
As anyone starts to look into memory, it should be observe right away that there is a line of memory philosophy that thinks the human mind can contain all the knowledge in the universe. The basic idea is that if you can just get the right structure of the cosmos in your mind. Then all of the sudden the “mysteries of the universe” will start to open to you. Obviously this should be discarded for the human pride and self deception it is.
On the other hand, modern people tend to go the exact opposite to view our memories as small, unreliable, and incapable of holding on to much at all. That is also a huge error that fails to see the great tooling God has given everyone of us.
Basic Process of Memorization
From Unlock Your Amazing Memory by Brad Zupp
- Attend - You have to first attend to something. If you ignore it or are distracted, you will remember much less than if you are fully focused on something.
- Hold in Short-Term - In order to start memorizing something, you first need to pull it into your short term memory.
- Short-term/Working Memory is a limited resource. Everyone has a limit to what can be held in short term memory at once. Ideas that talk about this are: mental load, or digit span.
- Classical Psych research says the average digit span of an individual is about 7 to 9 digits that can be held in short term memory. Beyond that things start dropping off. This applies to words, images and any “item” you might want to hold in short term memory.
- Online digit span test: https://www.memorylosstest.com/digit-span/ I have lower digit span and start struggling at 6.
- This is why chunking is so effective. It takes what would otherwise be way too many individual items to hold in working memory and groups them into manageable sections. Strategies that help you do this quickly and effectively are way better than ones that just keep piling things on.
- An Example of this is a PAO system. It takes three things (a Person, Action, and Object) and attaches a pair of digits to each. You can then make 1 image by imagining the person doing the action with the object. Each part of the image is hooked to two digits. So right off the bat you are reducing the working memory load by half. Going from 6 individual digits to three “things.” You then reduce the load even more when you put them all together into a single image. Now you have one item in working memory that allows you to hold on to 6 individual digits! Memory athletes use strategies like this to make long numbers or decks of cards manageable.
- Short-term/Working Memory is a limited resource. Everyone has a limit to what can be held in short term memory at once. Ideas that talk about this are: mental load, or digit span.
- Save to Long Term memory
- Once you can “fit” something into your working memory then you can actually work on hooking it into long-term memory and recalling it. Every time a memory successfully is pulled back out of long-term into working it will grow in strength.
- Reading and reviewing engages a related, but not the same part of your brain as recalling something from memory. Cited: Verbatim Memory Tool for Memorizing Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians by Donald L. Potter
- The fastest way to cement something in long term memory is to practice recalling from your own mind not just reading or interacting with it. Strategies that get you recalling right away will be way more effective than the “read it 20 times” or “listen to it 100 times” stuff. Those are good for familiarity but are not really focused on memorization proper. In other words, You do interact with the material with those strategies but it does not build the exact neural pathways you need for direct recall while actually recalling the content does.
- You can think about it like the difference between a first person and second person story. If you are familiar with a story and can get the gist of it, it is like telling a story with “have you heard about…” in the second person. If you can recall it directly it is more like telling someone a story about something that happened to you directly in the first person.
- Actually recalling something to mind from what is already in memory is how you cement it into long term memory further. If you are always checking the original or just trying to read and reread it. You will become more familiar with it but you will not be pushing it verbatim into conscious long term memory.
- Once something is truly in long term memory there is unlimited space to add more. Your long term memory does not run out of space the same way a hard drive does. It is more a questions of if you have indeed put it into long term and firmly connected it with other things, or only had it in short term.
- Additionally, if you just shove something into long term memory with no plan or strategy for how to retrieve it you will eventually run into trouble accessing things reliably.
- Recall or Recollection
- Recall is different from the way memories randomly pop into your mind, recall is the intentional process of bringing something to mind when you need it.
- Practicing recall allows you to self test memories and evaluate how well they are anchored. Times when things do not stick are not times to freak out and beat yourself up. They are opportunities the strengthen that memory. Often I find that the experience of slowing down to strengthen a weak memory ends up making it much stronger than those that initially “stuck” the first or second time.
- Recall needs to happen on some kind of spaced basis. There are many systems or suggestions for how long, but the big things is you actually need to value and want to remember and come back to what is being memorized. Otherwise it will eventually fade from disuse. As you might guess it goes back to the idea of associations. If it is important it should be connected all across your mind and brought up in all kinds of situations. If it is not, it will be isolated and easy to forget.
Forces That Tend to Work Against Our Memory
- The Primacy Effect. We tend to have an easier time recalling items from the beginning of a list or event.
- The Recency Effect. We also tend to have an easier time remembering the things that come at the end of a list, speech, or sermon because they are still in working memory.
- Taken together, the Primacy and Recency Effect means that stuff in the middle tends to be easy to forget.
- Source site: Primacy Effect
- Forgetting Curve. The idea that information decays at a steady rate if there is not further retrieval or connection to that information.
- Source site: Forgetting Curve